Is Michigan tap water safe? 1.7% of systems averaged PFOA/PFOS over the EPA limit
1.7% of Michigan’s 300 public water systems with a full set of results (5 systems) averaged PFOA or PFOS above the EPA’s 4 ppt limit in the EPA’s UCMR5 monitoring (2023-2025), using EPA’s own sampling-location average method. Nationally the figure is 11.4%, so Michigan ranks #38 of the states with enough data.
Michigan systems with the highest PFOA/PFOS location averages
| Water system | Analyte | Highest location average |
|---|---|---|
| Independence Township | PFOS | 9.7 ppt |
| Dundee | PFOA | 8.2 ppt |
| Gladstone | PFOS | 7.5 ppt |
| Kalamazoo | PFOS | 6.5 ppt |
| Fremont | PFOA | 4.6 ppt |
Check what your specific utility reported for YOUR ZIP code, and the exact filter that handles it: Check your water by ZIP →
Which PFAS show up most in Michigan
- PFBA (14 systems)
- PFPeA (14 systems)
- PFBS (14 systems)
- PFHxS (8 systems)
- PFHxA (7 systems)
Common questions about Michigan water
Is Michigan's tap water safe to drink?
In the EPA’s UCMR5 data, 1.7% of Michigan’s systems with a full set of results averaged PFOA or PFOS above the 4 ppt limit. That is an occurrence flag on public systems, not a verdict on your home’s tap. These are system-level records for public water systems, not a reading of any individual home’s tap, and they do not cover private wells. Confirm your own utility’s current Consumer Confidence Report, and test your tap if you’re unsure.
Does Michigan have PFAS in its drinking water?
In EPA UCMR5 monitoring, 5 of Michigan’s 300 public water systems with a full set of results averaged PFOA or PFOS above the EPA’s 4 ppt limit. Rates are over the water systems that reported a FULL set of UCMR5 results in this state (the only ones EPA’s method can average) — not all systems, and not population. A state that tested more systems can show more detections simply because it looked harder.
How do I check my specific Michigan water system?
Enter your ZIP on the water checker to see what YOUR utility reported and the filter that handles it.
Neighboring states
See the full 50-state water-quality index and the national PFAS data study.
Rates are over the water systems that reported a FULL set of UCMR5 results in this state (the only ones EPA’s method can average) — not all systems, and not population. A state that tested more systems can show more detections simply because it looked harder.
Sources: EPA UCMR5 occurrence data, Feb 2026 release (~95% complete; final reporting 2026) (2026-06), public domain; beyond-PFAS: EPA Six-Year Review (SYR4, compliance monitoring 2012-2019) + current state Drinking Water Watch (CA, FL). Computed by scripts/build_state_water_data.py. Built 2026-07-25. Every figure is traceable to the committed EPA data.