Is Vermont tap water safe? 0.0% of systems averaged PFOA/PFOS over the EPA limit
0.0% of Vermont’s 32 public water systems with a full set of results (0 systems) averaged PFOA or PFOS above the EPA’s 4 ppt limit in the EPA’s UCMR5 monitoring (2023-2025), using EPA’s own sampling-location average method. Nationally the figure is 11.4%, so Vermont ranks #47 of the states with enough data.
Check what your specific utility reported for YOUR ZIP code, and the exact filter that handles it: Check your water by ZIP →
Which PFAS show up most in Vermont
- PFBA (1 systems)
- PFBS (1 systems)
- PFOS (1 systems)
Beyond PFAS, 10.3% of 670 Vermont systems in the EPA Six-Year-Review record (2012-2019) reported at least one of arsenic, nitrate, TTHM, HAA5, fluoride, gross alpha, radium, or uranium above its EPA limit. That is a 2012-2019 snapshot, not current.
Common questions about Vermont water
Is Vermont's tap water safe to drink?
In the EPA’s UCMR5 data, 0.0% of Vermont’s systems with a full set of results averaged PFOA or PFOS above the 4 ppt limit. That is an occurrence flag on public systems, not a verdict on your home’s tap. These are system-level records for public water systems, not a reading of any individual home’s tap, and they do not cover private wells. Confirm your own utility’s current Consumer Confidence Report, and test your tap if you’re unsure.
Does Vermont have PFAS in its drinking water?
No Vermont system in the EPA’s UCMR5 monitoring averaged PFOA or PFOS above the 4 ppt limit — though some PFAS compounds were detected. Rates are over the water systems that reported a FULL set of UCMR5 results in this state (the only ones EPA’s method can average) — not all systems, and not population. A state that tested more systems can show more detections simply because it looked harder.
How do I check my specific Vermont water system?
Enter your ZIP on the water checker to see what YOUR utility reported and the filter that handles it.
Neighboring states
New YorkNew HampshireMassachusetts
See the full 50-state water-quality index and the national PFAS data study.
Rates are over the water systems that reported a FULL set of UCMR5 results in this state (the only ones EPA’s method can average) — not all systems, and not population. A state that tested more systems can show more detections simply because it looked harder.
Sources: EPA UCMR5 occurrence data, Feb 2026 release (~95% complete; final reporting 2026) (2026-06), public domain; beyond-PFAS: EPA Six-Year Review (SYR4, compliance monitoring 2012-2019) + current state Drinking Water Watch (CA, FL). Computed by scripts/build_state_water_data.py. Built 2026-07-25. Every figure is traceable to the committed EPA data.