Is your tap water safe? The honest answer is in your utility’s own federal record. In EPA UCMR5 occurrence data, Feb 2026 release (~95% complete; final reporting 2026), 1,693 of 10,299 US public water systems (16.4%, about 1 in 6) reported PFOA or PFOS above the 4-ppt federal limits — which also means about five in six reported under them. This is a check-yours question, not a panic question: enter your ZIP below to see your utility’s actual reported results, graded against the EPA limits and dated.
Try: 07102 Newark45202 Cincinnati48503 Flint28401 Wilmington
DEKALB COUNTY
All clear
The PFAS and lead/copper results we have for this utility are all non-detect or below their limits. (We do not test every regulated contaminant; see your utility's CCR for the full picture.)
Matched with high confidence (100%). Confirm it is the system on your water bill.
Good news: every regulated PFAS was non-detect in your utility's UCMR5 testing.
Per EPA UCMR5 (2023-2025), Feb 2026 release: DEKALB COUNTY, GA (PWSID GA0890001) -- All clear. The PFAS and lead/copper results we have for this utility are all non-detect or below their limits. (We do not test every regulated contaminant; see your utility's CCR for the full picture.) These are system-level EPA records, not a reading of any individual tap; confirm against the utility's current Consumer Confidence Report.
| PFAS (regulated) | Your utility | EPA limit | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFOA | non-detect (< ~4 ppt) | 4 ppt | Non-detect |
| PFOS | non-detect (< ~4 ppt) | 4 ppt | Non-detect |
| PFHxS | non-detect (< ~3 ppt) | 10 ppt (under reconsideration 2026) | Non-detect |
| PFNA | non-detect (< ~4 ppt) | 10 ppt (under reconsideration 2026) | Non-detect |
| GenX (HFPO-DA) | non-detect (< ~5 ppt) | 10 ppt (under reconsideration 2026) | Non-detect |
| Lead & Copper (90th pct) | Your utility | Action level | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead (90th percentile) | 5.5 ppb (12/31/2024) | 15 ppb | Below |
Copper: not reported to SDWIS for this system. We check it -- many systems report lead but not a copper 90th-percentile.
This is the SYSTEM's 90th-percentile result for a monitoring round -- a sampling statistic, not your tap's level. The only way to know YOUR tap is a tap-specific test.
Other regulated contaminants (nitrate, arsenic, TTHM, and more): not yet covered for your state in our data -- this means "not measured here", not "safe". See your utility's current CCR for these.
EPA violations: 8 drinking-water violation(s) on record: 0 health-based (a contaminant or treatment standard) and 8 monitoring/reporting (paperwork/testing-timing).
No PFAS action needed on these results. If you want to reduce trace organics anyway, a certified carbon filter helps.
$Basic carbon pitcher / faucet filter (NSF 42)
Improves taste and odor (chlorine). NSF/ANSI 42 only -- it does NOT reduce lead, PFAS, or other health contaminants unless it is ALSO certified to NSF 53.
UCMR5 results are grab samples; EPA states they do not indicate compliance with the MCLs.
Source: EPA UCMR5 (2023-2025), Feb 2026 release. Lead/copper and violations: EPA SDWIS/ECHO; state contaminant layers where covered. Graded against EPA health-based limits (limit + basis + as-of). Public-domain federal data; this report is a dated snapshot -- your utility's current Consumer Confidence Report is the official local record.
Frequently asked questions
Is my tap water safe to drink based on my ZIP code?
A ZIP code can tell you which public water system serves you, and that system’s own EPA-reported testing is the honest starting point. The report above shows your utility’s actual reported PFAS, lead and copper, and other regulated-contaminant results, graded against the federal limits and dated. Two cautions we state on every report: these are system-level records, not a reading of your individual tap, and a ZIP can be served by more than one system — confirm the utility on your water bill and its current Consumer Confidence Report (CCR).
How do I check my water quality by ZIP code?
Enter your 5-digit ZIP in the tool above. It resolves your public water system and shows that system’s reported results from the EPA’s UCMR5 PFAS monitoring (2023-2025), lead and copper 90th-percentile results and violations from EPA SDWIS/ECHO, and state-reported contaminants where your state publishes them. Every value is shown with its date and the EPA limit it is graded against. It is free, with no signup.
What does ‘reported above the EPA limit’ mean?
It means at least one reported monitoring result exceeded the limit — a flag worth knowing about, not a violation finding. The EPA’s PFOA/PFOS limit is a running annual average, and the EPA states that UCMR5 grab samples do not indicate compliance on their own. Compliance with the 4-ppt PFAS limits is not required until April 2029 (proposed extension to April 2031), so no utility is out of compliance on that line today. We say ‘reported above the limit’, never ‘in violation’, and we never make health claims from a monitoring number.
Does this cover private wells?
No. EPA monitoring programs and utility reports cover public water systems only. If you are on a private well, no database can tell you what is in your water — a certified lab test of your own tap is the only real answer.
Where does the data come from?
Public-domain federal and state records: the EPA’s UCMR5 PFAS occurrence data (2023-2025), EPA SDWIS/ECHO for lead/copper and violations, and state Drinking Water Watch records where states publish them. Every report states its sources and dates, and our national analyses of the same data are published as reproducible data studies you can check.